Friday, August 11, 2017

A Tribute to my Piano Teacher: Ms. Ruo Balko

Today I was listening to the Grieg Holberg Suite during my internship, played by Dr. Hastings, who passed away last year. Dr. Hastings was my piano professor when I went to the FSU piano institute four years ago. Listening to the Holberg Suite made me feel very sentimental, and I suddenly started crying. Dr. Hastings had a reputation for being hard on his students because he pushed them to be the best that they could be. I loved Dr. Hastings; he was the best, and being reminded of Dr. Hastings reminded me of my piano teacher who had pushed me to meet him in the first place, who has by far made the biggest impact on my life yet: Ms. Ruo Balko.

Ms. Balko is the reason I went to the magnet arts schools (BAK & Dreyfoos) for middle and high school, and music festivals like FSU, Eastern Music Festival, and Southeastern Piano Festival. Ms. Balko has not only been my piano teacher, but also my mentor in life. I remember when she used to live in Village Walk, the community across from Olympia where I lived. Our "45 min." piano lessons would start at 8:30 PM and often extend until 11:30 PM, sometimes even midnight while she shared her insights on life and music.

Ms. Balko cared about her students to the point of obsession. She was constantly trying to come up with creative ways of inspiring them to practice more, researching music opportunities, and modifying her teaching technique. She was both a teacher and an avid student, and loved her profession, music, and her students beyond anyone I've ever met. Her students consistently won piano competitions, but more importantly, loved music as an extension of Ms. Balko's dedication to music and her love for her students.

Ms. Balko was the first person in my life who truly pushed me to become the best that I could be, who gave me confidence to pursue impossible things by encouraging me to tackle pieces like Chopin Sonata no.2 and Prokofiev's 3rd Piano Sonata when I wasn't yet ready for them. I remember when I wanted to play the Prokofiev's 2nd piano concerto, a piece that other professors at piano festivals thought I was crazy for undertaking. Ms. Balko, in contrast, embraced the challenge and supported me. She's the reason that I was able to perform the concerto at Eastern Music Festival with the Eastern Philharmonic, an experience that I remember fondly to this day as the highlight of my high school piano adventures.

Ms. Balko influenced my mentality in life forever. She taught me how to love deeply through the example she set herself; to never give up, to be uncompromising when pursing what I want and love; to never fear difficult problems, to instead search for them and tackle them with conviction; to remember that anything, anything in the world, can be learned through time and hard work. I respect the teaching profession immensely, which exists solely for the betterment of the next generation: a very noble goal. I respect Ms. Balko even more for sizing up her role in society, and for being a teacher who cared. Ms. Balko inspired students like me to be the best that they could be, and I would not be where I am today if not for her. For that, I am immensely grateful.

Monday, August 7, 2017

Finding your Utility Function, a Discussion on Existentialism

As a preface, this essay reflects my beliefs and opinions at the moment, which I felt would be interesting to capture for future references. I want to emphasize that my beliefs change over time and that I don't want to impose anything on you; feel free to form your own opinions.

I found this paragraph from Vitalik Buterin's personal website especially interesting:
In late 2011, I participated in a high school programming competition where players program the code for a team of simulated robots that then fight each other. I won third place. Someone asked me: what was my strategy? Others gave command-and-control strategies such as "I went for the center". I simply replied "I gave each agent a utility function and let them independently act to maximize their own objectives". That moment would inform my political beliefs for years to come.
Although thinking about life in terms of maximizing utility is just another mask for expressing existentialism, a topic already discussed in abundance, Vitalik's paragraph resonated with me because it helped me think about the meaning of life in an impersonal way.

It's very tempting to compare ourselves against each other, and for society to measure individual success on a standardized ruler. Last semester, there was a period when my friends were getting higher grades on tests while studying less than I was, and simultaneously having enough time to work on cool personal projects. I felt really stupid and my self esteem took a hit.

A couple things helped me escape my unhealthy thoughts. I finally accepted that it was not possible, nor worthwhile, to aim for straight As at MIT, which allowed me to put in less effort into my classes and instead focus on more meaningful pursuits. Another breakthrough, which ironically helped me do much better on tests, was learning how to freakin' stop worrying about things.

Unexpectedly, I discovered how to stop worrying while working on a solution in Google foobar using Dijkstra's algorithm. Dijkstra's algorithm allows you to find the shortest path from a starting node to a target node through evaluating weights to decide on the next node to visit. The idea that Dijkstra's algorithm guarantees that you find the shortest path to a goal helped me internalize the mindset that everything will be alright. Sure, this confidence is unfounded, but it helped me learn how to stop worrying about my goals, and instead focus on the most productive thing to do in the present.

We learn best when we are able to receive feedback for our actions. In the absence of a more abstract goal, feedback can be social validation or money, or anything that fulfills a person's basic needs (see Maslow's hierarchy of needs). I admit that I am incredibly privileged because I was born into a circumstance that has allowed me to focus on more abstract goals. Nonetheless, in order for the analogy of Dijkstra's algorithm to life to work correctly, we need to have a pre-prescribed goal and a clear way of evaluating our path to it.

Given that you are like me, which is privileged as fuck, this is where values come into play. I interpret values as guidelines that people live by. Because "values" sounds too passive to me, I really benefited from interpreting life as a utility function instead. I want to emphasize that seeing life as a utility function is different from adopting values because a utility function means that you are actively trying to maximize your utility, and constantly gauging whether or not your actions are productive in this context.

For example, the utilities that I'm trying to maximize at the moment are to work on interesting problems and make a positive impact on the world, whereas Richard Feynman's probably were to learn as much about the world as possible and to be happy. These are very different motivations and it makes sense that we would approach life differently.

Understanding that everyone's utility functions are different has not only helped me understand people I care about in a deeper way, but also learn how to stop judging people based on my own metrics. Everyone has different motivations in life, and as long as they're not hurting anyone else, that's okay. Nonetheless, I enjoy interacting with people who have evaluated their utility functions at all because it means they've created meaning in their lives, they're more likely to be independent thinkers, and they're more likely to be active in their lives.

In summary, I've recently started to think of life as a utility function while using Dijkstra's algorithm to justify that I will reach my goals in the end, given I am focused on using my time as productively as possible in the present. I really enjoy thinking about these more abstract ideas in the context of computer science concepts. It shows that the humanities and sciences are really more similar than popular perception likes to think.